ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Perceptual-cognitive skills in talent development environments: a survey of academy football coaches in the United Kingdom.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Perceptual-cognitive skills (PCS) are a strong predictor of future expert performance in football. Theoretical and practical knowledge of PCS are important to inform (de)selection and development decisions. Despite their relevance to player development, limited research has explored how coaches working in talent development environments conceptualise and assess PCS in practice. This study aimed to critically examine perceptions of and engagement with PCS identification and assessment among UK academy coaches. Methods: An online survey collected data from 63 academy coaches regarding their understanding and identification of PCS within the age groups they coach. Results: Data indicated agreement between coaches PCS definitions and their importance in player development. However, variations in coaches' familiarity, confidence, and frequency of PCS identification, alongside differing views on the importance of specific PCS point to potential knowledge and practice gaps. Discussion: Further research is needed to understand and develop interventions that support coaches in enhancing PCS identification and assessment within this overlooked area of player development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.