ArticleWellcome open research2017
Rapid Ethical Appraisal: A tool to design a contextualized consent process for a genetic study of podoconiosis in Ethiopia.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors related to willingness to participate in biomedical research on neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Enhancing the ethical conduct of a longitudinal cluster-randomized trial of psychosocial stimulation intervention for children with complicated severe acute malnutrition through Rapid Ethical Assessment: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2021Trial
- Balancing Ethics and Culture: A Scoping Review of Ethico-Cultural and Implementation Challenges of the Individual-Based Consent Model in African Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024Article
- Rapid ethical appraisal of stakeholder views on research prior to undertaking immunopathogenesis studies on podoconiosis in northeast Ethiopia during a period of social instability.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2021Article
- Replication of HLA class II locus association with susceptibility to podoconiosis in three Ethiopian ethnic groups.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Rapid Ethical Appraisal: A tool to design a contextualized consent process for a genetic study of podoconiosis in Ethiopia.Wellcome open research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Obtaining valid informed consent from research participants in low-income settings can be difficult, partly due to participants' limited familiarity with scientific research concepts. The situation is complicated when conducting genomic research on a stigmatizing familial disease. Methods: We used Rapid Ethical Appraisal as a tool to assess local factors that were barriers to obtaining valid informed consent prior to conducting a genetic study of podoconiosis (non-filarial elephantiasis) in two Zones of Ethiopia. The tool included in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with patients, healthy community members, field workers, researchers/Institutional Review Board (IRB) members, elders, religious leaders, and care coordinators (charity staff who support treatment clinics). Results: Most patients and healthy community members did not differentiate research from routine clinical care (therapeutic misconception). Participants felt comfortable when approached in the presence of trusted community members. Regarding the mode of consent, field workers and care coordinators preferred verbal consent, whereas the majority of patients and healthy community members suggested the use of both verbal and written consent to accommodate varying literacy levels. Participants better understood genetic susceptibility concepts when analogies drawn from their day-to-day experience were used. Field workers and care coordinators considered the type of biological sample sought and gender were the most critical factors affecting the recruitment process. Most researchers and IRB members indicated that reporting incidental findings to participants is not a priority in an Ethiopian context. Conclusions: Understanding the concerns of local people in areas where research is to be conducted facilitates the design of contextualized consent processes appropriate for all parties and will ultimately result in obtaining valid consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.