Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884509›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2026

A retrospective real-world analysis of placental-based allografts on pressure ulcers.

David Kay, Marta Sandres-Corwin, Harry H Matundan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David KayWest Coast Wound & Skin Care, Burbank, CA, USA.
Marta Sandres-CorwinWest Coast Wound & Skin Care, Burbank, CA, USA.
Harry H MatundanWest Coast Wound & Skin Care, Burbank, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9540-5611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The records from a network of mobile wound clinics were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of a human placental-based allograft compared with the standard of care for patients with chronic pressure ulcer wounds and multiple comorbidities. Approach: Real-world evidence from a mobile wound clinic (July 2022-June 2023) was used to analyze patients with pressure ulcer wounds, most of whom received home-based wound care and had multiple comorbidities that worsened their chronic wounds. Patients were grouped into standard of care with debridement or standard of care with debridement and grafting intervention. After each visit, the wound area and depth were measured and recorded. Wounds were scored for granulation and epithelialization and eschar and slough during each visit. The standard of care with debridement and grafting cohort was monitored for graft duration, and the number of graft applications per wound was recorded. Statistical analysis used a paired Results: The standard of care with debridement and grafting cohort demonstrated an average percent change in wound area of 46% reduction, compared to a 42% increase in the standard of care ( Conclusion: We present real-world evidence demonstrating the use of placental-based grafts to reduce wound size in patients with chronic PU, multiple comorbidities and limited mobility. Our study highlights the importance of reviewing the current local coverage determination and making graft applications permissible based on patients' wound-care responses, thereby benefiting patient care and quality of life.

Indexed as

allograftschronic woundshuman placental-based membranepressure ulcersSOCulcers

Identifiers

PMID41884509
PMCPMC13009969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.