ArticleFood chemistry: X2026
Sweetness enhancement and mechanism by sweet aroma compounds in the sucrose solution using sensory, electronic tongue, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Study on the enhancement of volatile components extraction fromFrontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the sweetness-enhancing effects of nine sweet aroma compounds from sweet orange on 5% sucrose solution. Through static sensory evaluations and electronic tongue analysis, carveol was found to enhance sweetness most significantly (28.8%), followed by γ-decalactone (23.2%), γ-nonalactone (23.0%), and δ-decalactone (20.0%). By using the time-intensity method for dynamic sensory evaluation, it was shown that the perception of sweetness increased rapidly and the duration was slightly prolonged after the addition of sweet aroma compounds. Molecular docking showed a binding free energy of -5.9 kcal/mol for the T1R2/T1R3-sucrose complex. Ternary complexes with added aromatic compounds had substantially lower energies (-8.62 to -10.5 kcal/mol), indicating enhanced receptor-ligand affinity. Molecular dynamics results showed that the addition of aromatic compounds led to the decrease in the binding energy of the T1R2/T1R3-sucrose system, the enhancement of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, and the stabilization of dynamic changes in protein conformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.