ArticleACS catalysis2026
Few-Shot Ensemble Learning for Catalysis and Application to Trimetallics for Oxygen Reduction.
Article in ACS catalysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are increasingly used to accelerate catalyst discovery, but their accuracy and utility are often unclear, particularly when applying them to different computational setups or design spaces than those of the training data. This hinders their effective use in catalyst screening. Here, we improve accuracy and provide reliable uncertainty quantification through an ensemble-based, few-shot transfer learning strategy. The framework applies a bias-correction procedure to an ensemble of catalysis-focused MLIPs using a small number of density functional theory (DFT) labels from the target setup and design space. Applied to OH adsorption on bimetallic alloys, the approach reduces root mean squared errors (RMSEs) by 60% on average after incorporating just one additional DFT-calculated adsorption energy. For H adsorption on single-atom alloys, even the zero-shot ensemble is more accurate than any of the MLIPs, with further improvements when three to five DFT calculations are used for bias correction. The corrected ensemble yields well-calibrated uncertainty estimates, with miscalibration areas of just 0.039 and 0.088 for the two data sets. In a proof-of-concept screening campaign, the method identified a promising trimetallic candidate catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction using only four total DFT-calculated adsorption energies. Taken together, these results demonstrate that few-shot bias correction enables reliable transfer of MLIP predictions across mismatched alloy search spaces and DFT methodologies, providing a practical route to accurate, uncertainty-aware catalyst screening with high efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.