ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Injectable Non-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Associated with a Protective Buffer in Patients with Photoaging of the Periorbital Area.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of injectable non-crosslinked HA associated with a protective buffer in patients with photoaging, particularly in lateral canthal rhytids. Patients and Methods: We conducted a post-market interventional clinical investigation in patients with lateral canthal rhytids graded between 1 and 4 based on the crow's feet grading scale who received a single session of the product in the periorbital area. The primary endpoint of this clinical investigation was improvement in hydration. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the product efficacy against lateral canthal rhytids and infraorbital dark circles, subjects' and investigator's satisfaction, as well as the occurrence of any adverse events. The follow-up was for 7 days. Results: The study included 34 patients (6 male and 28 female) with a mean age of 53 ± 7.58 years. The mean corneometric index (CM value) increased from 57.17 ± 11.04 to 58.83 ± 7.36 (p < 0.05). Dynamic rhytids reduced by 6%, with a significant reduction in the crow's feet grading scale from 2.76 ± 0.69 to 2.59 ± 0.76 (p < 0.05). Infraorbital dark circles improved in 50% of patients. Patients' satisfaction was similar to the evaluators' satisfaction, with 74% of the patients rating the outcome as "improved" or " much improved", and 68% of evaluators rating the outcome as "improved" or "much improved" on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Mild ecchymosis was the only reported adverse event. Conclusion: Non-cross-linked HA associated with a protective buffer is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for the consequences of photoaging in the periorbital area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.