ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Application of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model in rehabilitation training for stroke patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program based on the information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model principles and its association with self-efficacy, functional recovery, quality of life, and caregiver burden among stroke survivors. Methods: A quasi-experimental, non-randomized controlled trial was conducted on 112 stroke patients. The IMB group received a 3-month IMB-based program integrating neurologists, rehabilitation therapists, psychologists, and caregivers, and focusing on information delivery, motivational interviewing, and personalized behavioral training. The usual-care group received standard care. The outcomes included self-efficacy (SSEQ), motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FMA), daily living ability (Barthel Index, BI), quality of life (SS-QOL), psychological status (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAMD; Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAMA), and caregiver burden (ZBI), assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Results: The IMB group achieved higher scores than the usual-care group in the following areas: self-efficacy (+82.5% from baseline; SSEQ: 82.5 ± 7.3 vs. 57.8 ± 8.1; Conclusion: The IMB-based multidisciplinary intervention was associated with improved stroke recovery outcomes and reduced caregiver stress. This model suggests a potentially scalable approach that warrants further investigation. Its integration of behavioral strategies with neurorehabilitation principles bridges a critical gap in holistic stroke care, emphasizing the importance of self-efficacy and multidisciplinary collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.