Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884317›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2026

Organizational culture and forensic science reliability: A lifecycle analysis of latent error pathways.

Michael P Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael P KesslerTexas Tech University, Department of Environmental Toxicology, 1207 Gilbert Dr, Lubbock, TX, 79416, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliability in forensic science is often inferred from accreditation and standards compliance. These controls are necessary, but they do not, by themselves, demonstrate stable performance under routine casework conditions. This conceptual synthesis treats reliability in the scientific systems sense: the capacity of a forensic science system to maintain stable performance and to interrupt error under ordinary operating constraints. Drawing on forensic science, safety science, and organizational research, it describes three mechanism-consistent pathways by which reliability can erode without overt nonconformance: latent conditions embedded in workload and review design; attenuation of weak signals as concerns are summarized or administratively closed; and lifecycle propagation, where early constraints shape later analysis, interpretation, reporting, and testimony. The Marshall Hale wrongful conviction is used as an illustrative mechanism map of how procedural completion can coexist with reduced corrective leverage across institutional boundaries.

Indexed as

Forensic science governanceForensic science reliabilityLatent error pathwaysOrganizational cultureQuality systems

Identifiers

PMID41884317
PMCPMC13010466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.