Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884242›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2026

Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: What's new and future directives?

Vipin K Goyal, Praveenkumar Shekhrajka, Suresh Kumar Bhargava, Saurabh Mittal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vipin K GoyalDepartment of Organ Transplant Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India. dr.vipin28@gmail.com.
Praveenkumar ShekhrajkaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India.
Suresh Kumar BhargavaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India.
Saurabh MittalDepartment of Organ Transplant Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney transplantation is a moderate to high-risk surgery, and postoperative outcome is closely related to good intraoperative fluid management. Suboptimal fluid management is adversely associated with poor graft and recipient outcomes. Hence, meticulous intraoperative fluid management is essential and requires in-depth knowledge of newly added fluids and hemodynamic tools for fluid monitoring. Over the years, fluid management during kidney transplant has significantly changed with the inclusion of newer fluids and dynamic indices of volume responsiveness. In this review, we will discuss the different types of fluids and hemodynamic tools available for perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation and their pros and cons on postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

Central venous pressureCrystalloid solutionsFluid therapyHaemodynamicKidney transplantationPerioperative period

Identifiers

PMID41884242
PMCPMC13010415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.