Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884237›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2026

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for nephrologists.

Muhammad M Javaid, Gina Tonkin-Hill, Martin Klein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad M JavaidDepartment of Medicine, South West Healthcare, Warrnambool 3280, Victoria, Australia.
Gina Tonkin-HillDepartment of Medicine, South West Healthcare, Warrnambool 3280, Victoria, Australia.
Martin KleinDepartment of Medicine, South West Healthcare, Warrnambool 3280, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related acute kidney injury (AKI) is a rare but serious complication in cancer patients. The presenting features are often non-specific, making it difficult to distinguish from other, more commonly encountered pre-renal and post-renal causes. However, a precise diagnosis is imperative to instigate a proper management plan and minimise the inappropriate use of immunosuppression, which might have serious consequences for such sick patients. The indications for ICI use have increased over the years, and they will likely become the standard of care for many more difficult-to-treat malignancies in the future. Nephrologists will become increasingly involved in the management of such patients, especially in challenging decisions regarding withholding and restarting the treatment and starting immunosuppression. The current guidelines are ambiguous regarding the diagnostic workup and differ in their recommendations about the utility of a kidney biopsy, withholding the offending agent, and rechallenging with ICIs once AKI has resolved. This article tends to explore these questions and provides an update on ICI-related AKI, summarising the information from recently published clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. It also examines the recommendations of the major international guidelines, provides practical information for the practising nephrologists and identifies the gaps in the current knowledge to help future research.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryAcute tubulointerstitial nephritisGlomerulonephritisImmune checkpoint inhibitorsNephritisNephrotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41884237
PMCPMC13010844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.