ReviewPatient preference and adherence2026
Intention to Engage in Exercise Rehabilitation Among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Scoping Review.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This paper compiles the scope of research on exercise rehabilitation intention among patients with cardiovascular diseases and identifies the current landscape, influencing factors, assessment instruments, and intervention strategies related to exercise rehabilitation intention, aiming to inform clinical efforts aimed at encouraging active patient engagement in rehabilitation. Methods: Eleven Chinese and English databases were systematically searched between the database's creation and August 28, 2024, under the scoping review methodology. Two researchers independently performed literature screening and data extraction. Results: A total of 25 studies were included (21 in English, 4 in Chinese), 16 specifically assessed exercise rehabilitation intentions in cardiovascular disease patients, approximately half (8/16) of the cardiovascular disease patients exhibited suboptimal exercise rehabilitation intention. The assessment tools for exercise rehabilitation intentions are diverse, with dimensions primarily focused on willingness and planning. Determinants included psychosocial, disease-related, and sociodemographic factors. Identified intervention strategies included group health education, individual psychological support, and motivational interviewing. Conclusion: Among cardiovascular disease patients exercise rehabilitation intentions remain inconsistent, as approximately half of the studies indicating medium-to-low average levels, which are influenced by several factors. Therefore, to accurately assess patients' levels of exercise rehabilitation intention, further research may focus on enhancing the dimensions, reliability, and validity of assessment tools. Exploring multifaceted and varied intervention strategies could potentially improve patients' exercise rehabilitation intention and compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.