ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology
Synergy of PET and MR imaging in the local and regional staging of bladder cancer.
Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognosis and optimal management of bladder cancer are closely dependent on accurate clinical staging. Traditional staging has relied on transurethral resection for T-staging in combination with cross-sectional imaging for N and M-staging. Computed tomography (CT) is the most accessible and common cross-sectional imaging modality to assess for local and distant spread of disease. However, CT alone lacks the contrast resolution to distinguish between non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive disease and has known difficulty distinguishing metastatic from normal lymph nodes (LNs). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been increasingly used in the workup of bladder cancer to address the shortcomings of CT imaging. MRI using the multiparametric combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and diffusion-weighted imaging can more clearly delineate the extent of tumor involvement in the bladder. PET can use a variety of metabolically active radiotracers to visualize cancerous tissue, allowing the identification of metastases that may not be readily visible on CT. PET scans can also detect disease in normally sized LNs that do not meet conventional CT size thresholds. The combination of MRI and PET scans has not been explored in detail with respect to bladder cancer workup but may theoretically combine the strengths of both approaches to provide the most comprehensive, noninvasive tool for preoperative staging, with improved sensitivity and accuracy compared to other modalities. This narrative review uses a systematic search of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.