ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Development and Validation of a 28-Day Mortality Prediction Model for Patients with Sepsis Complicated by Autoimmune Diseases Using Two Machine Learning Methods.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Mortality and Outcome Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a prognostic model for patients with sepsis complicated by autoimmune diseases using machine learning methods and validate the model. Methods: Data on patients with sepsis and autoimmune diseases were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database. Participants were randomly divided into training set and validation set according to the ratio of 7:3. The predictors were selected by using LASSO regression analysis and the Boruta algorithm which affect the 28-day prognosis of patients. A nomogram was developed based on independent risk factors identified by logistic regression for 28-day prognosis and was internally and externally validated using calibration curves and DCA. Based on nomogram scores, patients were stratified into high- and low-score groups, with KM analysis demonstrating significant differences in mortality between the cohorts. Results: A total of 1,481 patients from the MIMIC-IV database met inclusion criteria and an external validation set included 57 patients from the Department of Critical Care Medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Ten overlapping predictors (Age, Gender, BMI, WBC, BUN, PT, APTT, history of cerebrovascular disease, history of liver disease, and CRRT) were identified by LASSO and Boruta algorithms and were subsequently confirmed as statistically significant independent risk factors through logistic regression. The prediction model built by the ten predictors showed superior predictive performance compared to the SOFA score in training (AUC=0.772), internal validation (AUC=0.771), and external validation cohorts (AUC=0.787). Hosmer-Lemeshow tests and calibration curves indicated strong agreement between predicted outcomes and actual observations across all cohorts, and DCA suggested significant clinical utility. The KM curve shows that the mortality rate of the high-score group is significantly higher than that of the low-score group. Conclusion: A prognostic model for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients with autoimmune diseases demonstrated robust predictive performance and clinical applicability upon internal and external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.