Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for general anesthesia in pediatric strabismus correction surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.
Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of ciprofol for general anesthesia in pediatric strabismus correction surgery. Patients and methods: A total of 108 pediatric patients aged 4-12 years scheduled for strabismus correction surgery were randomly divided into two groups: the ciprofol group (Group C) and the propofol group (Group P). For anesthesia induction, Group C received an intravenous injection of ciprofol 0.5 mg/kg, alfentanil 20 μg/kg, and vecuronium bromide 0.05 mg/kg; Group P received an intravenous injection of propofol 2 mg/kg, alfentanil 20 μg/kg, and vecuronium bromide 0.05 mg/kg. After successful induction, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted and mechanical ventilation was initiated. For anesthesia maintenance, Group C was given a continuous intravenous infusion of ciprofol 1.25 mg/kg/h and alfentanil 40 μg/kg/h, while Group P received a continuous intravenous infusion of propofol 5 mg/kg/h and alfentanil 40 μg/kg/h. At the end of surgery, the infusion of anesthetic drugs was stopped, and the laryngeal mask airway was removed after the patients regained consciousness. The primary outcome measure was the anesthesia success rate. The secondary outcome measures included hemodynamic changes at different time points, induction time, emergence time, and the incidence of perioperative adverse events. Results: The anesthesia success rate was 100% in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in hemodynamic changes at different time points, operation time, and emergence time between the two groups ( Conclusion: Ciprofol can be safely used for general anesthesia in pediatric strabismus correction surgery, with non-inferior anesthesia success rate compared with propofol and a lower incidence of adverse reactions. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300078654.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.