Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884116›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2026

herbUA Collectors: An open-source framework for online publication of the herbarium collector-centric data.

Andriy Novikov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andriy NovikovState Museum of Natural History of the NAS of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine State Museum of Natural History of the NAS of Ukraine Lviv Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-5070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The digitisation of herbarium collections is typically aimed at mobilising and distributing data about the specimens, while often omitting data about the individuals who contributed to the formation of these collections. Despite the obvious need to create databases of herbarium collectors, as well as to structure and standardise the data about them, there is currently no consolidated view on this regard. Many efforts have been made to develop various collector-centric databases, but there is no simple and quick way to present such data online by self-running herbaria or small initiatives. Therefore, here I introduce a framework that allows for easy configuration of WordPress to display data about herbarium collectors. New information: This article describes the herbUA Collectors repo, allowing for the configuration of a standard WordPress installation for: (a) filling and online publishing the database of the herbarium collectors; (b) representing records about each collector as a single web page; (c) providing an interactive map search facility; (d) visualising the basic statistics on the database.

Indexed as

collectorsdata visualisationdigitisationvirtual herbariumWordPress

Identifiers

PMID41884116
PMCPMC13010167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.