ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development
Feedback and Debriefing in Healthcare Education to Improve Communication Skills: A Large Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Feedback and debriefing are crucial components of communication skills training, as they foster reflective learning and support the consolidation of core competencies. This review aims to systematically identify, map, and analyze the literature on how feedback is implemented in communication training in the context of healthcare education. Methods: This scoping review follows the 5 stages of the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and ÓMalley (2005). Four online databases-MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo via Ovid, and ISI Web of Knowledge-were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Results: 365 articles were included in the final analysis. Articles reported that communication skills training is frequently conducted in small-group settings, with participants receiving immediate post-event feedback from multiple perspectives. There was a notable lack of consistency in reporting details related to the characteristics of debriefers and standardized patients, as well as in the approaches used to guide the debriefing process. Structured, multiphase feedback methods were rarely described. Conclusions: This review shows that, although the importance of feedback in communication skills training is widely acknowledged, it is rarely described in sufficient detail. A clear gap emerges between the theoretical understanding of feedback's value and characteristics and its structured implementation in practice. While there is a slight trend toward increased use of standardized feedback models, this appears unrelated to the specific setting, communication scenario, or profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.