Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884072›Full record

ReviewFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2025

Sim and Learn: Simulation and its Value in Neurology Education.

Laveena Singla, Fariha Jamal, Anju Abu, Dana Ionel, Amtul Farheen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laveena SinglaUniversity of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson.
Fariha JamalMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Anju AbuMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Dana IonelLexington Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kentucky.
Amtul FarheenUniversity of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Simulation is a widely used health care education tool. Its use is increasing in acute neurologic conditions and has great potential to help trainees better perform procedures and enhance communication and professionalism. Observations: This article describes the different neurologic simulations used as educational tools and the evidence that demonstrates their value. It also details the benefits afforded by simulations (eg, improved adherence to protocols, reduced door-to-needle time in stroke care) and areas of opportunity. It includes the use of virtual reality to allow trainees to interact with 3-dimensional models of the brain as well as augmented reality to view real-world objects with digital information overlays. Conclusions: Simulation-based training is a valuable and increasingly essential component of neurology education. These training programs offer structured opportunities to practice clinical reasoning, identify common diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls, and improve coordination across multiple specialties. This approach not only supports the development of clinical competence but also contributes to patient safety and quality of care. As the complexity of neurological care grows, integrating simulation into training curricula is a necessary step in preparing health care professionals for high-stakes, real-world practice.

Identifiers

PMID41884072
PMCPMC13012436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.