ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2025
Staff Perspectives on the VISN 20 Tele-Neuropsychology Program.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of tele-neuropsychology (teleNP) is increasing within Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 20. A quality improvement survey was conducted to better understand VISN 20 staff opinions of teleNP, how to improve the services, and whether it is preferred over face-to-face (F2F) neuropsychology evaluations in community-based settings. Methods: The authors surveyed US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) VISN 20 staff from February 7, 2024, to June 15, 2024. Eighteen of 33 respondents had referred patients for neuropsychology services during the previous year. Results: The mean (SD) rating of teleNP usefulness was 1.5 (0.8) (between very much so and mostly useful on the scale) and the rating of non-VA F2F neuropsychology evaluation usefulness was 1.7 (0.9). A Wilcoxon signed rank-test of related samples indicated no differences between the pairs of ratings ( Conclusions: While response rate was low, the survey provides initial support for the acceptability and utility of teleNP among VA staff who responded to the survey, with favorable comparisons of teleNP to existing F2F neuropsychology resources.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.