Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884063›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026

Veterinary costs, productivity and profitability on Norwegian dairy cow and sow farms.

Marcel van Asseldonk, Klaus Mittenzwei, Ron Bergevoet, Richard Helliwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcel van AsseldonkWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Klaus MittenzweiInstitute for Rural and Regional Research, Oslo, Norway.
Ron BergevoetWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Richard HelliwellInstitute for Rural and Regional Research, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous call for reduced antibiotic use on farms is challenging for farmers without compromising productivity and profitability. In Norway, stringent antibiotic use regulation and disease prevention measures have contributed to achieving the lowest veterinary antibiotic sales in Europe. The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between veterinary costs (including antibiotic expenditures but also veterinary advice services to support low level of antibiotic use) and farm performance (productivity and profitability) amongst both dairy cow and sow farms in Norway. To examine this relationship, the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) database comprising cross-sectional farm data from 2011 to 2021, was analysed. Average veterinary costs amounted 172 Euro per cow and 84 Euro per sow in 2021. Furthermore, FADN panel data analysis revealed that a higher milk production per cow is associated with higher veterinary costs, namely 1.1 Euro per additional 100 liter per cow. The estimated effect of more piglets sold per sow on veterinary costs amounted approximately 2.48 Euro per extra piglet sold per sow. Dairy and sow farms with higher veterinary costs per animal tend to have lower income per animal. Compared to other European countries livestock productivity is relatively low in Norway while profitability is maintained by means of subsidies easing the need to maximise productivity enabling restrictive antibiotic use.

Indexed as

Animal health economicsAntibiotic useFarm accountingPanel dataVeterinary costs

Identifiers

PMID41884063
PMCPMC13011221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.