ArticleWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2026
Comparison of bilirubin albumin ratio and total serum bilirubin for predicting neurological dysfunction in newborns: A meta-analysis.
Article in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction (BIND) remains a serious complication of severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, especially in resource-limited settings. While total serum bilirubin (TSB) is widely used for risk stratification, the bilirubin/albumin (B/A) ratio has been proposed as a surrogate for free bilirubin, the neurotoxic fraction.
aimTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of the B/A ratio
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating the B/A ratio and TSB for predicting BIND in neonates (≥ 35 weeks' gestational age). Data sources included PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD), sensitivity, specificity, and heterogeneity (
resultsFive studies involving a total of 1022 neonates were included, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 57:40. The SMD for B/A ratio was 1.71 (95%CI: 1.00-2.41,
conclusionBoth TSB and the B/A ratio are comparably effective in predicting BIND. While the B/A ratio may provide incremental value in specific clinical contexts, current evidence supports continued reliance on TSB for routine risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.