ArticleWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2026
Understanding recurrent wheezing: A parent's guide.
Article in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: 100-day window: Reframing early follow-up and parental guidance in recurrent wheezing.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent wheezing following acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI) in early childhood is a common clinical problem and may be an early indicator of chronic respiratory diseases. Early identification of associated risk factors is essential for early intervention and prevention.
aimTo investigate the risk factors and timing of recurrent wheezing episodes following ALRTI in children.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted among pediatric patients ≤ 5 years old admitted with ALRTI and wheezing at Naresuan University Hospital between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2023. Participants were followed for 12 months. Data from electronic and paper records were analyzed using STATA 18.0. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests compared recurrence and non-recurrence groups through survival curves.
resultsSignificant predictors of recurrent wheezing included age 12-24 months [odds ratio (OR): 2.38; 95%CI: 1.50-3.78,
conclusionChildren with certain demographic and clinical features have higher recurrent wheezing risk after ALRTI, highlighting the need for closer monitoring and early preventive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.