ArticleWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2026
Maternal and neonatal determinants of newborn sepsis: A case-control study in resource-limited settings.
Article in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal sepsis continues to remain a serious threat, with multiple maternal and neonatal risk factors. Understanding these determinants will empower clinicians in comparable settings to apply targeted interventions, ultimately reducing newborn morbidity and mortality.
aimTo assess maternal and infant risk factors, the aim is to develop evidence-based strategies for preventing neonatal sepsis.
methodsA total of 453 neonates and their mothers were enrolled, of which 146 were cases. Clinical, demographic, and obstetric data were analyzed including maternal infection history, delivery conditions, neonatal characteristics, and respiratory support requirements. Statistical associations were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine independent risk factors.
resultsMale sex (adjusted odd ratio [AOR] = 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-3.5), forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (AOR = 3.4; 95%CI: 1.1-14.9), fewer than four antenatal care visits (AOR = 2.9; 95%CI: 1.4-6.5), prolonged labor > 24 hours (AOR = 6.2; 95%CI: 2.8-17), rupture of membranes > 18 hours (AOR = 3.0; 95%CI: 1.6-6.8), and maternal urinary tract infection (AOR = 3.5; 95%CI: 2.4-29.4) significantly increased neonatal sepsis risk. Unclean vaginal examinations (AOR = 4.2; 95%CI: 1.6-11) and foul-smelling amniotic fluid (AOR = 10.3; 95%CI: 1.9-56.4) were among the strongest risk factors. Among neonatal factors prematurity (AOR = 4.3; 95%CI: 2.8-6.6), low birth weight ≤ 1500 g (AOR = 3.6; 95%CI: 2.2-5.7), birth asphyxia (AOR = 4.3; 95%CI: 2.4-7.6), and small-for-gestational-age status (AOR = 2.1; 95%CI: 1.1-4) were significant predictors. Respiratory support showed a strong correlation, with surfactant administration (AOR = 9.7; 95%CI: 4.1-22.9), continuous positive airway pressure) (AOR = 15.4; 95%CI: 9.4-25.1), and invasive ventilation (AOR = 53; 95%CI: 12.7-89) as the highest risk factors. Extended newborn intensive care unit stays (> 7 days: AOR = 38.9; > 15 days: AOR = 30) further elevated the likelihood of sepsis, likely due to nosocomial exposure.
conclusionThe findings highlight the importance of enhanced prenatal care, timely labor management, strict hygiene protocols, and focused neonatal monitoring to reduce neonatal sepsis incidence. Addressing modifiable risk factors, including maternal infections and respiratory interventions, could significantly improve neonatal outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.