ArticleFood and waterborne parasitology2026
Performance assessment of ISO 23036-1:2021 for parasite detection in the seafood industry.
Article in Food and waterborne parasitology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A verification plan was carried out to assess the reliability of seafood companies (operators) in complying with the standard ISO 23036-1:2021, an international voluntary benchmark method specifically designed for detecting zoonotic Anisakidae larvae in fish musculature (edible part). This plan involved the intensive inspection of 19,465 individual fish across various sample batches (three consecutive one year projects), fish species, NE Atlantic fishing grounds and seasons. A verification process was carried out on 5600 fish pressed portions, which were primarily inspected by operators at their own facilities, followed by independent quality control at the IIM-CSIC, an experienced research lab acting as verifier. Sample and data traceability were made possible by the Biobank Technical Unit (UTB-IIM-CSIC), which previously trained the staff of operators and provided complete technical assistance and mentoring on critical control points along the verification process. Performance evaluation was based on the level of agreement between operator findings and those of the verifier, both in parasite detection and counting. While numerical discrepancies (i.e. different number of anisakid larvae detected by the operator and the verifier) reached up to 22.8%, critical false positives and negatives were relatively low at 2.5% and 1.7%, respectively. Two main sources of error were identified: a) faults related to deviations from the ISO procedure, and b) misinterpretations of fluorescence signals, stemming from limitations in technical skill. Both error types were traced back to staff competence and the need for more continuous robust training. Overall, the verification plan yielded promising results, demonstrating that ISO 23036-1: 2021, if properly used, is a reliable tool that should be incorporated in HACCP for controlling fish parasite hazards at the seafood industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.