ReviewTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2026
Spondyloarthritis in Latin America: a difficult-to-diagnose challenge.
Review in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spondyloarthritis (SpA) presents unique diagnostic challenges in Latin America (LATAM) due to genetic, clinical, healthcare, and sociocultural factors. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria-developed mainly in North America and European populations-may not accurately reflect the LATAM phenotypic variability. Key issues complicating diagnosis include lower human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) prevalence, clinical heterogeneity, and inconsistent symptom presentation. Many patients develop symptoms later in life compared to their European counterparts. Extra-articular manifestations like uveitis, enthesitis, and tarsitis are common and may precede the diagnosis, contributing to delays. In addition, inflammatory back pain, often used as a referral criterion, has limited specificity and may lead to misdiagnosis. Healthcare systems in LATAM are often under-equipped to recognize and manage SpA efficiently. General practitioners (GPs) and even non-rheumatologist specialists may lack awareness of hallmark symptoms, leading to prolonged referral processes and multiple misdiagnoses. The average diagnostic delay is around 4.2 years, with women facing even longer delays. Use of classification criteria as diagnostic tools further complicates timely recognition. The ASAS criteria often exclude HLA-B27-negative patients and those without clear imaging findings in sacroiliac joints. This leads to underrepresentation in clinical studies and underestimation of disease burden. To improve diagnosis, a comprehensive clinical evaluation-including history, physical exam, imaging, and laboratory test-by rheumatologists familiar with the local disease spectrum. Tools like magnetic resonance imaging, enthesitis indices (e.g., Mander Enthesis Index, Defining Enthesitis on Ultrasound in Spondyloarthritis Enthesitis Index), and spinal mobility measures (e.g., Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index) should be integrated into clinical practice. There is also a need to validate diagnostic and classification criteria specifically for LATAM populations, incorporating region-specific genetic and clinical profiles. Greater awareness, earlier specialist referral, and locally tailored criteria are essential to reduce diagnostic delays and improve outcomes for patients with SpA in LATAM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.