ArticleiScience2026
Response of vegetation phenology to hydrothermal variables on the QTP using EVI and MSAVI.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetation phenology is a key indicator of how the Qinghai-Tibet plateau (QTP) ecosystem responds to changes in the hydrothermal environment. However, sparse QTP meteorological stations make observed traditional hydrothermal variables (air temperature and precipitation) insufficient for research needs. Building upon analyses of vegetation phenology using enhanced vegetation index and modified soil-adjusted vegetation index, this study adopts alternative hydrothermal variables (land surface temperature [LST], effective moisture and surface albedo). Geodetector and partial correlation analysis were employed to reveal the response mechanisms between vegetation phenology and hydrothermal variables. Results indicate that the length of the growing season (LOS) is primarily driven by the end of the growing season (EOS). From 2001 to 2020, EOS showed a significant positive correlation with LST. Compared to traditional variables, these variables demonstrated stronger explanatory power for vegetation changes. Hurst index analysis revealed vegetation recovery trends. This study provides scientific support for ecological management on the QTP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.