Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883997›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2026

Influence of stepped support on older adults' internet insomnia intervention engagement and outcomes.

Kelly M Shaffer, Katharine E Daniel, Philip I Chow, Karen Ingersoll, Lee M Ritterband

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03213132 (An Insomnia Internet Intervention for Older Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03213132 nacompletednot on this map

An Insomnia Internet Intervention for Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled311ConditionsInsomnia, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersArmsSHUTi (Sleep Health Using the Internet), Patient Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelly M ShafferCenter for Behavioral Health & Technology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Katharine E DanielCenter for Behavioral Health & Technology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Philip I ChowCenter for Behavioral Health & Technology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Karen IngersollCenter for Behavioral Health & Technology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Lee M RitterbandCenter for Behavioral Health & Technology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While delivering care by the Internet holds substantial potential to increase access to behavioral insomnia treatment, sustaining user engagement is considered a challenge. Minimal human support may enhance intervention engagement and efficacy, and older adults may particularly benefit from additional support for otherwise self-directed Internet interventions. Objectives: Test whether a human-delivered stepped support protocol improves engagement and outcomes using a fully-automated cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia program tailored for older adults (Sleep Healthy Using the Internet-Older Adult Sufferers of Insomnia and Sleeplessness [SHUTi-OASIS]). Methods: Adults aged 55 and older with insomnia ( Results: There was minimal activation of stepped support (14 of 102 SHUTi-OASIS+SS participants). There were no consistent differences in engagement or insomnia outcomes found when comparing SHUTi-OASIS versus SHUTi-OASIS+SS participants, nor when comparing only low-engaging participants across each condition ( Conclusions: In this trial, most older adults engaged with the Internet intervention as instructed without the need for human support. Findings highlight the utility of highly-engaging Internet interventions for addressing older adults' healthcare needs. Study preregistration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03213132; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03213132; first registered July 6, 2017).

Indexed as

Cognitive-behavioral-therapy for insomniaDigital healthEngagementInsomniaInternet interventionOlder adultSleep problems

Identifiers

PMID41883997
PMCPMC13010986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.