Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883984›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2026

Enhancing explainability and performance of the depression detection model on social media utilizing feature engineering and LLMs.

Syauki Aulia Thamrin, Arbee L P Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Syauki Aulia ThamrinDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Arbee L P ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0003-5751-1266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a mental disorder that negatively affects many people worldwide. The traditional method to help diagnose depression is through questionnaires, and better diagnoses can be obtained by consulting psychiatrists. Because the methods are time-consuming, researchers search for a way to efficiently and effectively diagnose depression before it is too late. Social media data is then utilized for detecting depression since people tend to express their feelings on social media. Different deep learning methods have been proposed for detecting depression on social media. However, the explainability regarding the classification result is limited to identifying negative emotions from the words in the posts. In this research, we aim to enhance the explainability and performance of the depression detection model by utilizing feature engineering and Large Language Models (LLMs). For feature engineering, we compute emotional status, which consists of twelve features representing emotion not just for each post but also before and after the post for some period of time. We also consider language used in the post by using different word embedding models. Different sequence models are also explored, and an attention mechanism is used to help identify the most important posts. The emotional status of the important posts and the classification result are then input to the LLM to describe and relate the emotional status to the characteristics of depression. Based on our experiment, fine-tuning LLM using mental health-related data did help the LLM to produce better explainability by relating easier-understood emotional status to specific characteristics of depression.

Indexed as

Depression detectionExplainabilityFeature engineeringLarge language modelSocial media

Identifiers

PMID41883984
PMCPMC13009361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.