ReviewJournal of caring sciences2025
Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Concept Analysis.
Review in Journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The concept of collaboration in primary care is described using various terms, reflecting differences in context and professional roles. Although interprofessional collaboration is not a new concept in health care, various terms reflect the complexity and diversity of the different roles and contributions of each health profession. Hence, this study aimed to analyze the concept of interprofessional collaboration in primary care. Methods: The concept was analyzed using Walker and Avant's eight-step method. A literature search was also done using the following databases: Clinical Key, Scopus, ScienceDirect and PubMed from January 2010 to February 2024. The search terms used were "interprofessional collaboration" AND "primary care" OR "primary health care". In the initial search, 315 articles were found but finally 17 articles were deemed relevant and included in the analysis. Results: Key defining attributes of interprofessional collaboration include effective communication, teamwork, patient-centered care, shared leadership, and mutual respect. Antecedents include organizational support, education/ training, and commitment. Consequences of interprofessional collaboration include improved quality of care, improved patient satisfaction, efficiency in the disease management, and professional development. Conclusion: Five attributes of interprofessional collaboration, its antecedents, and consequences may aid researchers in better understanding the concept and its application in nursing practice. Caring-centered relationships, which lie at the core of nursing practice, are essential to supporting interprofessional collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.