ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026
Research Progress on the Classification of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound parameters for predicting high bleeding risk and efficacy of uterine artery embolization in gestational sac-type cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective single-center study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- The Role of Interventional Radiology in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gynecological Conditions.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Management and outcomes of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancies: a single-center retrospective case series.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a special type of ectopic pregnancy that occurs after a cesarean section. In recent years, with an increase in the cesarean section rate, the incidence of cesarean scar pregnancies has also increased. This article systematically reviews the development and latest progress of various CSP classification methods to compare the diagnosis and treatment strategies of different CSP classifications and better manage patients with CSP. We evaluated various classification methods using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2011 level of evidence, providing a basis for objective and precise classification of CSP in the future and thus providing more accurate clinical guidance for individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.