ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Impact of Thin and Thick Intrapartum Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid on Cesarean Delivery and Neonatal Outcomes in Low-Risk Pregnancies.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether thin and thick meconium-stained amniotic fluid are risk factors for increased rates of cesarean delivery, both for fetal and non-fetal distress indications, as well as for operative vaginal delivery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on low-risk singleton pregnancies. They were divided into three groups for comparisons of outcomes: the control group (clear amniotic fluid), the thin meconium group, and the thick meconium group. Results: A total of 12,171 women met the inclusion criteria, comprising 10,341 with clear amniotic fluid and 1,730 (15.0%) with meconium-stained amniotic fluid, of which 1,159 (9.5%) had thin meconium and 671 (5.5%) had thick meconium. Most labor outcomes in the thin meconium group were comparable to those in the control group. However, in the thick meconium group, the overall rate of cesarean delivery, including those indicated for both fetal distress and non-fetal distress, as well as the rate of operative vaginal delivery, were significantly increased after adjustment for potential confounders, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.93, 2.25, 1.72, and 1.95, respectively. Additionally, the rate of low Apgar scores was significantly higher in the thick meconium group. Conclusion: Thick meconium-stained amniotic fluid was identified as a risk factor for an increased rate of cesarean delivery, both for fetal distress and non-fetal distress indications. The latter may be related to a lower threshold for decision-making, as physicians may fear potential fetal compromise, leading to unnecessary cesarean deliveries. Stricter criteria for cesarean section indications in cases of thick meconium should therefore be emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.