ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Barriers to Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare in Cameroon: A Qualitative Study of Key Stakeholder for mMIST Intervention Adaptation.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eliminating maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality are global health priorities. Cameroon has some of the highest levels of maternal and neonatal mortality in the world. Evidence-based maternal healthcare is vital to ensuring women's and infants' health; however, offering such services in low-income countries is often challenging. Mobile health interventions have the potential to overcome longstanding public health barriers to fill gaps in maternal and infant care. This is among the first qualitative studies in Cameroon that examines individual and interpersonal barriers to maternity care to inform mHealth intervention adaptation. Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews (n=38) and three focus groups (n=18) with key stakeholders including previously pregnant women who experienced an adverse event, currently pregnant women, maternity care providers, healthcare administrators, and Ministry of Health representatives. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo12 software. Themes were categorized on the individual and interpersonal levels. The current study is part of a larger, long-term implementation project to adapt MIST to the local contexts of Cameroon using mobile phones. Results: A total of 56 respondents, 14 men and 42 women, participated in this qualitative research. Participants reported individual-level barriers for women's timely and appropriate maternity care related to antenatal care initiation, antenatal care utilization, health literacy, and blind trust in providers. Participants suggested that women waited to initiate antenatal care, underutilized antenatal care, lacked perinatal health literacy, and trusted their providers, regardless of health outcomes and complications. At the interpersonal level, husbands, religious leaders, and family were identified by participants as influencing women's perinatal healthcare decisions-making, both positively and negatively. Conclusion: Our data reveal individual and interpersonal forces that affect maternal and perinatal care in Cameroon. Future public health efforts can focus on improving health literacy during pregnancy and reproductive years among women as well as in their close social networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.