Association of Department Chair Allyship With Scholarly Productivity of Underrepresented in Family Medicine Faculty: A CERA Study.

Introduction: Underrepresented in family medicine (URiFM) physicians hold 14.42% of US family medicine faculty positions. Scholarship is critical to academic advancement. We explored family medicine department chairs' racial allyship, their identification of scholarship barriers faced by URiFM faculty, and the existence of initiatives to increase scholarship. Methods: We used the 2022 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) Department Chair survey to examine the percentage of chair-perceived URiFM departmental faculty members and their scholarly productivity and chair-perceived barriers to productivity and initiatives. We measured chairs' racial allyship. We calculated descriptive statistics, weighted means, and used regression to identify whether chair characteristics or allyship scores were associated with support of URiFM faculty scholarship initiatives and identification of the minority tax. Results: One hundred nine chairs completed the survey (response rate 48.4%); 13.76% identified as URiFM; 6.4% reported they perceived more than 50% of their faculty were URiFM; 90.8% of chairs did not report programs supporting URiFM scholarship; and 44.9% described URiFM faculty scholarly output as minimal or none. Department chairs' mean allyship score was 2.59 (SD = 0.80) out of 5. Chairs ranked lack of research skills and lack of funding for protected time higher than the minority tax from a list of scholarship barriers. We found no association between chair allyship scores, chair characteristics, total department full-time equivalents, and the existence of a URiFM faculty scholarly support program. Discussion: Despite chairs reporting low URiFM faculty scholarly output, few departments have a dedicated support program. Chair allyship scores were not associated with identification of scholarship barriers or existence of scholarship programs.