ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2026
Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education in a Family Medicine Residency.
Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Competency-based medical education (CBME) provides a paradigm shift in graduate medical education focusing on predefined competencies rather than time. This approach emphasizes frequent assessment along with resident-driven learning plans to promote continuous growth. We assessed how implementation of CBME was perceived by residents, affected resident knowledge, and impacted assessment data. Methods: This was a single-institution, observational study conducted from July 2024 to June 2025. The curricular change included using a direct observation evaluation form, creation of individualized learning plans, and training faculty to be coaches. Perception of CBME implementation was evaluated through a survey sent to all residents. Pre- and postexposure data were collected on in-training exam scores, milestone subcompetency scores, and total evaluations completed. We used descriptive statistics and a one-sided Welch's Results: Resident survey data showed residents agreed that implementing CBME, direct observations evaluations, and coaching were positive changes. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education survey data showed an increase in satisfaction with faculty feedback from 3.7/5.0 to 4.0/5.0 postexposure. In-Training Examination scores increased after the exposure across all postgraduate years ( Conclusion: Residents found implementation of CBME within a family medicine residency program to be generally positive. There was a dramatic increase in the number of evaluations completed and satisfaction with faculty feedback. Elements of CBME can be successfully implemented and improve evaluation processes used in family medicine residencies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.