Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883927›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Rescue cyclophosphamide for severe multiple sclerosis relapses.

Vlad C Bibic, Robert Carruthers, Daniel Hong, Donna Kuipers, Karen Tulloch, Virginia Devonshire, Alice Schabas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Donna Kuipers
Karen Tulloch
Virginia Devonshire
Alice SchabasDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia MS Clinic, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-1715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) causes early, rapid accumulation of disability with frequent and severe relapses, incomplete recovery from relapses, and/or high T2 lesion burden. Severe relapses are typically treated with high-dose IV corticosteroids followed by plasmapheresis. Patients who do not respond to initial treatment lack universally accepted second-line options. Cyclophosphamide is used in clinical practice for MS patients that do not respond to initial relapse therapy. Despite its use, there is no conclusive data demonstrating its efficacy. Objective: To review the UBC MS clinic experience in using cyclophosphamide as a rescue therapy for MS patients. Methods: We screened the UBC MS Clinic pharmacy database to identify MS patients followed at the UBC MS clinic that received cyclophosphamide between June 2009 and June 2024 for retrospective chart review. Results: The median EDSS score prior to cyclophosphamide therapy was 6 (range 2.5-9). Thirteen out of 23 patients had an improvement in EDSS, including 6/23 with a ≥3 EDSS numerical improvement. Conclusion: Rescue cyclophosphamide treatment was associated with improvement in EDSS in MS patients with a relapsing course. Despite the availability of high-efficacy DMTs, this cohort shows there may be a role for cyclophosphamide in the context of severe relapses.

Indexed as

cyclophosphamidedemyelinationdisease-modifying therapiesMultiple sclerosissafetytreatment response

Identifiers

PMID41883927
PMCPMC13009894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.