ArticleCureus2026
The Diabetic Hand as a Diagnostic Blind Spot: A Case of Severe Pseudohyperglycemia Masking Critical Hypoglycemia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and hand osteoarthritis (OA) are prevalent, painful comorbidities in diabetes mellitus. While their symptomatic burden is recognized, their potential to create critical diagnostic blind spots by compromising point-of-care glucose monitoring is an underappreciated patient safety hazard. These conditions can compromise the local capillary bed through nerve compression, joint inflammation, and microvascular dysfunction, thereby invalidating the core physiological assumption of point-of-care glucose monitoring: that a fingertip sample accurately reflects systemic glucose levels. An 80-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes presented for knee surgery. A routine postoperative capillary blood glucose (CBG) check yielded a value of 23 mmol/L, triggering a protocol for insulin administration. As the patient was asymptomatic, clinical suspicion led to a venous blood glucose test, which revealed hypoglycemia at 2.5 mmol/L. A systematic, multi-step verification was performed: the device was recalibrated, a repeat CBG from a different site on the same hand was obtained, and a second glucometer of a different brand was used to test both the ipsilateral and contralateral hands. All point-of-care readings remained persistently elevated (23-24 mmol/L), confirming a reproducible physiological error. A subsequent physical examination identified previously undiagnosed bilateral CTS and severe hand OA, pathologies constituting a "diabetic hand" with compromised peripheral perfusion. This near-miss event presents a critical paradox: severe pseudohyperglycemia in a setting where classic physiology predicts the opposite artifact. The finding persisted despite the exclusion of common technical errors, underscoring a novel and dangerous failure mode associated with the compromised diabetic hand. The case demonstrates that such hand syndromes can catastrophically invalidate point-of-care glucose monitoring. It argues for the routine assessment of hand pathology in diabetic patients and warrants immediate venous verification of any clinically discordant point-of-care result to prevent catastrophic error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.