Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883900›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Mapping the Evidence on Abdominal Weight Training for Respiratory Muscle Strength: A Scoping Review.

Keita Matsuda, Hiroki Sato, Tomohiro Ikeda, Syo Katayama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keita MatsudaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, JPN.
Hiroki SatoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, JPN.
Tomohiro IkedaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, JPN.
Syo KatayamaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review synthesized evidence on abdominal weight training (AWT), a non-invasive method for respiratory muscle rehabilitation that increases diaphragmatic load, to evaluate its clinical significance. We specifically summarized its effects on respiratory muscle strength, measured by maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), diaphragmatic function, and patient outcomes, including ventilator weaning. A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases conducted on March 13, 2025, identified five studies meeting the inclusion criteria: one randomized trial, two comparative trials, one crossover trial, and one experimental study. Participants included patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation or chronic respiratory failure as well as healthy adults. The findings indicated that AWT is associated with improved MIP and MEP and enhanced diaphragmatic function in patients with compromised respiratory health. Furthermore, clinical benefits such as improved ventilator weaning rates have been reported, with evidence suggesting that AWT can effectively retrain diaphragmatic breathing patterns. Although AWT appears to be a promising intervention for improving respiratory muscle strength and function in specific populations, the limited number of studies and heterogeneous protocols underscore the need for well-designed trials to standardize training regimens and confirm clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

abdominal weight trainingbreathing exercisesdiaphragmrespiratory muscle trainingscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41883900
PMCPMC13010238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.