ReviewCureus2026
Mapping the Evidence on Abdominal Weight Training for Respiratory Muscle Strength: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review synthesized evidence on abdominal weight training (AWT), a non-invasive method for respiratory muscle rehabilitation that increases diaphragmatic load, to evaluate its clinical significance. We specifically summarized its effects on respiratory muscle strength, measured by maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), diaphragmatic function, and patient outcomes, including ventilator weaning. A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases conducted on March 13, 2025, identified five studies meeting the inclusion criteria: one randomized trial, two comparative trials, one crossover trial, and one experimental study. Participants included patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation or chronic respiratory failure as well as healthy adults. The findings indicated that AWT is associated with improved MIP and MEP and enhanced diaphragmatic function in patients with compromised respiratory health. Furthermore, clinical benefits such as improved ventilator weaning rates have been reported, with evidence suggesting that AWT can effectively retrain diaphragmatic breathing patterns. Although AWT appears to be a promising intervention for improving respiratory muscle strength and function in specific populations, the limited number of studies and heterogeneous protocols underscore the need for well-designed trials to standardize training regimens and confirm clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.