ArticleCureus2026
Association Between the Cancer and Aging Research Group Score and Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Portuguese Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Older adults are more likely to be affected by cancer and are at higher risk of chemotherapy‑related toxicity. The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score was developed to estimate the risk of severe toxicity in older patients receiving chemotherapy, but its performance varies across settings and populations. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the CARG risk score and chemotherapy‑related toxicity in older adults with solid tumors treated at a Portuguese Oncology Center. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients aged ≥65 years with solid malignancies who received chemotherapy between January and December 2023 at our center. Patients treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapies were excluded. Baseline clinical and geriatric variables were collected from electronic medical records. Toxicities were graded using CTCAE v5.0; the maximum toxicity grade per patient was recorded. Spearman's rank correlation assessed the association between the CARG score and maximum toxicity grade. Results A total of 283 patients were included (median age 73 years (range 65-93); 56.2% (n = 159) male; ECOG PS 0 in 65.4% (n = 185)). The median BMI was 25.2 kg/m²; median SCr 0.86 mg/dL; median SHb 12.4 g/dL. Overall, 84.1% (n = 238) experienced at least one chemotherapy‑related adverse event: grade 2 in 49.1% (n = 139) and grade 3-4 in 32.9% (n = 93). Fatigue (n = 88, 31.1%) and neutropenia (n = 80, 28.3%) were the most frequent toxicities. The median CARG score was 6 (range 2-18); 21.9% (n = 62) were low‑risk, 59.4% (n = 168) intermediate‑risk, and 18.7% (n = 53) high‑risk. The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity increased across CARG categories: low 22.6% (n = 14), intermediate 41.2% (n = 69), and high 79.2% (n = 42). The CARG score correlated significantly with maximum toxicity grade (Spearman R = 0.27; p = 2.8 × 10⁻⁶). Conclusions In this real‑world Portuguese cohort of older adults with solid tumors, the CARG score was significantly associated with chemotherapy‑related toxicity, with a stepwise increase in severe events across risk categories. Although the correlation strength was modest, these findings support the use of CARG as a complementary tool to anticipate toxicity and guide shared decision‑making. Prospective studies incorporating modern systemic therapies and capturing the impact of low‑grade toxicities are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.