ReviewChemical science2026
Metal complexes in medicine: structural scaffolds
Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal complexes occupy a distinctive position in medicinal chemistry by combining well-defined three-dimensional structures with tuneable reactivity that cannot be readily achieved using purely organic compounds. This review examines metal-based therapeutics through a unifying conceptual framework that distinguishes between coordination complexes functioning primarily as inert structural scaffolds and those in which the metal centre serves as the dominant functional element. Scaffold-dominated complexes exploit kinetically stable coordination geometries to present ligands in rigid, stereochemically defined arrangements, enabling selective recognition of proteins and nucleic acids through shape complementarity and spatial control. In contrast, functional-centre-dominated complexes derive biological activity from metal-centred processes such as ligand exchange, redox cycling, catalysis, and photophysical activation, allowing dynamic and stimulus-responsive interactions with biological systems. The review highlights representative examples across both paradigms and emphasizes strategies that intentionally bridge structural stability with controlled activation at the target site. Emerging stimulus-responsive and multimodal approaches illustrate how metal complexes can be integrated into optimized therapeutic systems that align chemical reactivity with biological context and treatment modality. Collectively, this perspective underscores the unique structural and mechanistic space occupied by metal complexes in medicine and outlines design principles to guide the development of next-generation metallodrugs with improved selectivity, efficacy, and translational potential.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.