ReviewJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
Biomechanical effects of foot orthoses in children with flexible flat foot; a systematic review.
Review in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flexible flatfoot, characterized by a collapsed medial longitudinal arch during weight-bearing, was a common pediatric condition associated with pain, balance deficits, and an increased risk of musculoskeletal complications. Foot orthoses were frequently prescribed, but their biomechanical effects in children had not been fully established. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the biomechanical effects of foot orthoses in children with flexible flatfoot. Methods: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest) were searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, quasi-experimental studies, and cross-sectional studies that evaluated biomechanical outcomes of orthotic interventions. Due to heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black checklist. Results: Twenty-two studies (n = 844; mean age: 8.9 years; 52% male) were included. Orthoses reduced midfoot plantar pressure (up to -48.5 kPa), ankle inversion moments (-0.3 Nm/kg), and center of pressure displacement (-5 mm), while improving step length (+5 cm), balance, muscle activity, and radiographic indices (e.g., talonavicular coverage angle improved by 5°). Predictors of better outcomes included low navicular height (<1 cm), high arch index (>0.26), and higher pain scores (>3). Conclusion: Foot orthoses offered measurable biomechanical benefits in pediatric flexible flatfoot. Clinical use should be individualized and guided by objective assessment. Further high-quality RCTs with standardized outcome measures and longer follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.