SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
The effectiveness of dance interventions on sleep quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sleep health is increasingly recognized as central to physical and mental wellbeing, yet sleep disturbances are common and may be worsened by modern lifestyles. The WHO recognizes dance as a feasible form of physical activity, but evidence for sleep benefits is limited. This meta-analysis quantified the overall and domain-specific effects of dance interventions on sleep quality. Methods: A systematic search strategy integrating Medical Subject Headings terms and free-text keywords was employed to identify empirical studies investigating the effects of dance interventions on sleep quality across four major English-language databases. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. A meta-analysis was conducted with R 4.5.1 and Stata 18.0, pooling standardized mean differences (SMDs) under a random-effects model. Domain-specific, sensitivity, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed, and publication bias was examined using Begg's and Egger's tests. Results: 10 RCTs (711 participants) were included. Compared with controls, dance significantly improved sleep quality (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.14-0.82), representing a small-to-moderate effect. At the domain level, only subjective sleep quality remained significant after Holm multiple adjustment, with an effect size of SMD = 0.47. In the sensitivity analysis restricted to studies using the PSQI only, the effect size was attenuated (SMD = 0.355), while heterogeneity decreased substantially ( Conclusion: Sleep is an important determinant of individual physical and mental health. Dance interventions, as a nonpharmacological approach, produce a statistically significant overall improvement in sleep quality, with a small-to-approaching-moderate effect that is supported by consistent findings across sensitivity and meta-regression analyses, and with a particularly pronounced improvement in the subjective sleep quality domain. Exploratory subgroup patterns suggested that a group-based aerobic dance program conducted three times per week, 60 min per session, over 12-16 weeks may be associated with greater benefits compared with lower-frequency or shorter-duration dance interventions. In practice, priority should be given to using homogeneous instruments and to standardized reporting of prescription components and adherence, in order to enhance the translational value of the public health evidence. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD420251104782, available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251104782.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.