ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Citizen science for healthier food environments: a realist-informed process evaluation of the big food map app in Flanders, Belgium.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Food environments, the physical, economic, political, and sociocultural contexts shaping food availability, affordability, marketing, and social norms, strongly influence dietary behaviors and population health. The Big Food Map ( Methods: The Big Food Map smartphone application was co-created with citizens, particularly adolescents and adults on lower incomes, as well as with actors, such as local governments, retailers, and short-chain initiatives. Co-creation involved Photovoice workshops with adolescents and adults on lower incomes and Group Model Building sessions with actors to explore how they understand food environments and identify key food environment dimensions and settings. Citizens and actors also tested and refined the app. The app was launched in May 2025 until August 2025 to crowdsource and provide feedback on citizen perceptions and behaviors related to neighborhood food environments. A brief evaluation questionnaire assessed the app's usefulness and potential behavioral impact among citizens, while a more detailed survey explored stakeholder perspectives on the co-creation process and policy relevance. Results: In total 4,707 citizens contributed data across 1,320 neighborhoods (48% of all Flemish neighborhoods) and evaluated 11,313 food outlets. Participants appreciated the opportunity to visualize and discuss their local food environments. Approximately half liked the app's design, 24% reported increased awareness of their food environment, and 56% said they would participate again. Both citizens and stakeholders highlighted challenges around long-term engagement, technical usability, and inclusion of vulnerable groups. The co-creation process strengthened partnerships between research, policy, and practice and underscored the value of tailoring citizen science tools to local contexts and communication channels. Discussion: The Big Food Map demonstrates the feasibility and potential of citizen science to enrich food environment monitoring and stimulate local dialog and action. To sustain engagement and policy relevance, future efforts should strengthen collaboration with local governments and media, diversify participation strategies, and embed citizen science tools into municipal food policy strategies or frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.