Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883770›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2026

MicroRNAs in sepsis: Advances in diagnosis and prognostic monitoring.

Valeria Fraioli, Marco Sanvitti, Federico Bilotta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valeria FraioliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Lazio, Italy.
Marco SanvittiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Lazio, Italy.
Federico BilottaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Lazio, Italy. bilotta@tiscali.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis and septic shock remain major global health challenges, with persistently high mortality despite advances in critical care. Conventional diagnostic tools, including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early disease. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding RNAs regulating gene expression, have emerged as promising biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and therapeutic monitoring. This narrative review synthesizes clinical studies published after 2022, highlighting the evolving role of circulating and extracellular vesicle-derived miRNAs in sepsis. Diagnostic investigations confirmed the accuracy of miRNA-451a (miR-451a) and miR-9-5p, while expanding evidence supports miR-193b-5p and miR-135a as additional diagnostic candidates. Contrasting results on miR-181a-5p emphasize the need for further validation. Prognostic and therapeutic monitoring studies identified miR-155, miR-182, miR-146b-5p, miR-126-5p, miR-195, and miR-497 as dynamic markers reflecting immune modulation and disease trajectory. Collectively, these findings highlight circulating miRNAs as powerful, versatile biomarkers that advance precision medicine in sepsis, pending multicenter validation and methodological standardization for clinical translation.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCirculating microRNAsDiagnosisExtracellular vesiclesPrecision medicinePrognosisSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID41883770
PMCPMC13010834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.