Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883741›Full record

ReviewJRSM cardiovascular disease

Sepsis-associated myocarditis: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and future directions.

Kedir Negesso Tukeni, Mohammed Mecha Abafogi, Kidus Tesfaye Bezabih, Esayas Kebede Gudina, Nikolaus Alexander Haas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kedir Negesso TukeniJimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2769-1772
Mohammed Mecha AbafogiJimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Kidus Tesfaye BezabihJimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Esayas Kebede GudinaJimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Nikolaus Alexander HaasLMU, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis-associated myocarditis is a major challenge in critical care, driving global morbidity and mortality through cardiac dysfunction. Despite advances in diagnostics, consensus on optimal management remains lacking. This review explores epidemiology, clinical complexities, and research gaps. A systematic search of OVID MEDLINE and Scopus (2000-2025) using terms "sepsis," "myocarditis," "cardiac dysfunction," and "inflammatory cardiomyopathy" identified 10,344 records. After removing duplicates (2323) and applying filters for human studies (1840), English language (1775), and publication year (1340), 87 articles were eligible. Thirty were excluded for lacking outcome data, leaving 57 studies for final analysis, supplemented by 13 additional articles that highlight therapeutic strategies, emerging directions, and supportive evidence. Study quality was assessed using PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Sepsis-associated myocarditis is characterized by myocardial inflammation and impaired cardiac function, often worsened by systemic inflammatory responses. Left ventricular dysfunction is frequent, influenced by infectious agents, immune dysregulation, and drug toxicities. While diagnostic modalities have improved, therapeutic approaches remain inconsistent, with no standardized protocols established. Current management typically involves intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and vasopressors, yet patient outcomes vary widely. The absence of consensus highlights an urgent need for targeted research to clarify mechanisms, define effective interventions, and improve survival in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

mortalityrecovery statusreview articleSepsisSepsis-Associated Myocarditis

Identifiers

PMID41883741
PMCPMC13009935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.