Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883650›Full record

ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2026

Resolving the organ transplantation challenges by 3D bioprinting: A scoping review on case studies.

Parimal Shinde, Sangita Jogdand, Smruti Besekar, Raju Shinde, Suraj Dhankikar, Akansha Arewar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Parimal ShindeMBBS 2nd Year, JNMC, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra.
Sangita JogdandDepartment of Pharmacology, JNMC, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra.
Smruti BesekarDepartment of Pharmacology, JNMC, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra.
Raju ShindeDepartment of Surgery JNMC, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra.
Suraj DhankikarDepartment of Clinical Education, Rotation and Research, Creekside Behavioural Health, Kingsport, TN, USA.
Akansha ArewarDepartment of Dental, Creekside Behavioural Health, Kingsport, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the organ shortage and enhance surgical precision, 3D bioprinting has now become an innovative approach and technology that furnish practical challenges in the conventional medicine. Given the importance, the review is performed to understand clinical benefits and usage of this technology by using case studies on the 3D organ bioprinting implemented on the human live patients that implies about the various techniques of 3D organ printing. The study follows the standardized preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis structured (PRISMA-S) approach for the extraction of the relevant study from the databases by using the specific keywords such as "3D bioprint" and "Case study." Only five pertinent case studies are selected which include pubic bone rebuilding, spinal defect repair, and liver transplantation in complex anatomical circumstances. It is noted from the studies that using 3D bioprint in complex cases reduced operative time by 30% and it enhanced anatomical visualization, surgical accuracy, and preoperative planning, but also emphasizes issues like expense, adaptability, and regulatory concerns, highlighting the necessity for further study and clinical use.

Indexed as

3D printbioprintorgan donorsorgan graftsorganstransplantation

Identifiers

PMID41883650
PMCPMC13012372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.