ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Developing a community-based screening model for refractive error in school-aged children in Indonesia.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUncorrected refractive errors among school-aged children in Indonesia represent a significant public health challenge, necessitating a comprehensive screening model. To develop a community-based screening model for refractive error detection in Indonesian school-aged children through expert consensus, establishing implementation guidelines across multiple healthcare dimensions. MATERIALS AND
methodsA three-round Delphi consensus study involving 86 multidisciplinary experts in Indonesia was designed to develop a structured screening model for community implementation. The study examined five key dimensions through systematic Delphi rounds: policy, screening period and frequency, program design, human resources, and facilities/infrastructure. Expert opinions were gathered iteratively, focusing on practical implementation aspects and system integration. Consensus measurement methodologies are typical of Delphi studies, including analysis of expert agreement levels and qualitative analysis of feedback patterns across consultation rounds.
resultsExpert consensus emphasized primary healthcare integration, national guidelines establishment, and dedicated funding allocation. The model recommended annual screenings with age-appropriate methods, standardized training modules, and collaborative approaches between health and non-health professionals. Key infrastructure requirements and data management protocols were identified.
conclusionsThe study developed a comprehensive screening model targeting early detection of refractive errors and improved child development outcomes. The model emphasizes stakeholder engagement and healthcare system integration. Future research should evaluate long-term outcomes and model adaptability in various settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.