ArticleDigital health
A qualitative study investigating caregiver perspectives of an artificial intelligence assistive device to support daily activities in families with children with autism spectrum disorder.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parent's AI Coach (PaiCoach): A Single-Case Experimental Study of an AI-Supported Parent Coaching System for Autistic Children.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their families report diverse challenges in adaptive functioning. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assistive devices can offer innovative solutions to support adaptive functioning by offering real time assistance and capacity to adapt to heterogenous needs. Objective: This qualitative study utilised an AI-assistive device, the Pixi Home-Hub, to explore caregiver perspectives, experiences and needs related to the broader potential of AI to support adaptive functioning in their daily lives. Methods: Criterion purposive sampling recruited 10 caregivers of children with ASD. Two focus groups were conducted to discuss how an AI-assistive device, the Pixi Home-Hub, could support their child and families adaptive functioning. Content analysis was utilised to interpret the data. Independent coding by a second reviewer, analytical memos and peer review were employed to promote rigour. Results: Three key themes emerged from the data: (1) Caregiver experiences of their child's adaptive functioning in daily activities and areas for growth, (2) Caregiver experiences of balancing their child's support needs with their own, and (3) Access and barriers to integrating AI technology into everyday use. Conclusion: Caregivers believed that AI-technology can play a role in supporting their family's adaptive functioning activities and proposed using AI-assistive devices as a digital support navigator to facilitate greater access to health and government supports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.