Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883538›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Balancing benefits and barriers: Experiences of digital health consultations among older adults and healthcare staff.

Karin Myrberg, Annica Björkman, Lars-Christer Hydén, Christina Samuelsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karin MyrbergCentre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7934-0109
Annica BjörkmanFaculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9513-3102
Lars-Christer HydénClinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina SamuelssonClinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Despite having high healthcare needs and being suitable candidates for digital health consultations, older adults (OAs) use these practices less commonly, and are more likely to encounter challenges, which reduces digital health equity. The objective of this study was to examine the experiences of OAs and healthcare staff (HS) using and participating in digital consultations. Methods: A descriptive approach was employed, using both structured and semi-structured interviews with OAs (≥65 years) and HS who had completed a digital health consultation via video or asynchronous chat within the past week. Interview data were analysed with thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Results: The descriptive data ( Conclusion: Digital health consultations offer significant practical benefits for both OAs and HS, and sometimes also benefit care. However, persistent technical and relational barriers highlight the need for improved usability and adaptability. Addressing these challenges and supporting individual preferences are essential steps toward increasing accessibility and ensuring equitable access to digital consultations for OAs.

Indexed as

digital equityDigital health consultationsolder adultsrapporttelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41883538
PMCPMC13009575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.