Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883520›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Machine-learning-based risk assessment of hypertension among older adults in Korea.

Hocheol Lee, Yejun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hocheol LeeDepartment of AI Health Information, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1467-8843
Yejun KimAI Health Data Lab, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4381-7179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: South Korea is expected to become a super-aged society at the fastest rate among all Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development nations. Such a society can become a burden on primary healthcare, resulting in an increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, including hypertension (HYP). However, studies on the prevalence of HYP in older adults are lacking. This study aimed to construct an optimized performance machine learning (ML) model to assess HYP risk and identify associated risk factors among older adults in Korea. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study included 3214 participants aged ≥65 years who were enrolled in the "Maeum Juchieui" program in Seoul, Korea. Depression, stress, anxiety, basal metabolic rate, oxygen saturation, heartrate, and average daily step count were measured using a digital device via a smartphone app. HYP, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, body fat percentage, and body muscle percentage were also measured. Results: Of the five ML models, the Random Forest model exhibited the best performance. Hyperlipidemia, diabetes, basal metabolic rate, body muscle percentage, body fat percentage, average daily step count, stress, heartrate, and depression influenced HYP among older adults. Conclusion: The findings indicate that health programs implemented by the Korean government for older adults that are directly or indirectly associated with HYP risk factors can have a positive effect on reducing HYP. Furthermore, the South Korean government must monitor policy-based programs for chronic diseases among older adults to ensure that such programs can be applied to those residing in vulnerable areas.

Indexed as

agedcross-sectional studyHypertensionmachine learningRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID41883520
PMCPMC13009759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.