ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Another prospective study on the safety of ondansetron for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: addressing ongoing concerns.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The safety of ondansetron for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) remains a subject of ongoing debate, driven by conflicting study results and a disagreement between the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the European Network of Teratology Information Services (ENTIS) regarding its potential fetal risks. Objective: To assess the safety of using ondansetron for NVP and its possible association with major birth defects and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted based on structured telephone follow-ups of women with NVP who contacted the NVP Helpline at a teratology information service (TIS) at the Shamir Medical Center between April 2014 and April 2018. Exposure and clinical characteristics were recorded during the initial consultation, and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were ascertained after the estimated date of delivery using a validated questionnaire. Women treated with ondansetron formed the exposed group; controls did not receive ondansetron but could use other NVP therapies. Subgroup analyses explored the dose and frequency of use. Results: The analysis included 260 women (137 exposed; 123 controls). Baseline characteristics were broadly comparable, except for higher NVP severity in the ondansetron group, reflected by higher PUQE scores (9.86 ± 2.66 vs. 8.59 ± 2.49; p = 0.001) and more frequent antacid use (p = 0.001). Live birth rates (95.6% vs. 94.3%) and birth weights did not differ between groups. No differences were found in neonatal complications. Major congenital malformations were comparable between groups (5.1% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.695), with no consistent pattern identified. Conclusion: In this prospective cohort, ondansetron exposure was not associated with increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes or major congenital malformations. The sample size limits the detection of very rare outcomes, and larger studies remain warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.