ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
A meta-analytic review of Mandarin tone perception: tone height and tone contour, prosodic background, and L2 experience.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis synthesizes data from 18 empirical studies to examine how tonal features of height and contour, native prosodic background, and second language (L2) experience affect the perception of Mandarin lexical tones. Results revealed overall large effect sizes, indicating that variability in tone perception is statistically robust and theoretically significant. Importantly, substantial heterogeneity across studies was explained by key methodological moderators, including task type, stimulus type, outcome measure, sample size, and gender composition. Studies using passive hearing tasks, synthesized stimuli, accuracy-based outcome measures and more female participants consistently produced larger effect sizes, suggesting enhanced perceptual salience and reduced processing demands. Moreover, moderate sample sizes were sufficient to detect meaningful effects, particularly in cross-linguistic comparisons. Analyses confirmed three major findings: (1) Tone height and pitch span critically shaped perceptual accuracy, with high-pitched tones and those with greater pitch span perceived more accurately; (2) Native prosodic background significantly modulated tone perception, with pitch-accent and tone language speakers generally outperforming non-tonal listeners. However, perceptual assimilation could either facilitate or interfere with tone perception in tone language listeners when similar categories existed in their L1 and the target language; (3) L2 experience was a positive predictor of tone perception accuracy; however, improvements followed a nonlinear, tone-specific trajectory. Tone 2 and Tone 3 remained persistently challenging to differentiate, with substantial progress typically observed only at advanced proficiency levels. Together, these results underscore the complex interplay between acoustic properties, language background, and learning experience in Mandarin tone perception, offering valuable insights for both theoretical modeling and pedagogical practice in second language acquisition of tones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.